AB193: Bill Text

2. The court next multiplies each parent's gross child support obligation by the parent's percentage of time spent with the child or children, based on the periods of physical placement ordered by the court.

3. That product for each parent is then subtracted from the parent's gross child support obligation to produce the parent's net child support obligation. Thus, the parent who cares for the child or children the greater amount of time has his or her gross child support obligation reduced by a larger proportion of that obligation.

4. The parent with the resulting larger net child support obligation pays child support to the other parent in the amount of the difference between the 2 net child support obligations.

As under current law, the court may upon request modify the amount of support that would be determined by using the method of calculating child support that is outlined in the law, after considering the same factors as under current law and upon finding that use of the new method is unfair to the child or either of the parties.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

AB193, s. 1 Section 1. 49.22 (9) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,3,7 49.22 (9) The department shall promulgate rules that provide a standard for courts to use in determining a child support obligation based upon a percentage of the gross income and assets of either or both parents. The rules shall provide for consideration of the income of each parent and the amount of physical placement with each parent in determining a child support obligation in cases in which a child has substantial periods of physical placement with each parent.

AB193, s. 2 Section 2. 767.085 (2) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,3,13 767.085 (2) (b) The clerk of court shall provide without charge, to each person filing a petition requesting child support, a document setting forth the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9) and the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) and listing the factors which that a court may consider under s. 767.25 (1m).

AB193, s. 3 Section 3. 767.085 (2m) (a) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,4,2 767.085 (2m) (a) 2. Shall be accompanied by a document, provided without charge by the clerk of court, setting forth the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9) and the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) and listing the factors which that a court may consider under s. 767.25 (1m).

AB193, s. 4 Section 4. 767.085 (2m) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,4,7 767.085 (2m) (b) If service is by publication, notification regarding s. 948.31 may consist of references to the statute numbers and titles, and but information relating to the percentage standard, the method of calculating child support and the factors need not be provided.

AB193, s. 5 Section 5. 767.23 (1n) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,4,20 767.23 (1n) Before making any temporary order under sub. (1), the court or family court commissioner shall consider those factors which that the court is required by this chapter to consider before entering a final judgment on the same subject matter. If the court or family court commissioner makes a temporary child support order that deviates from the amount of support that would be required by using the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9) method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j), the court or family court commissioner shall comply with the requirements of s. 767.25 (1n) or 767.51 (5d), whichever is appropriate. A temporary order under sub. (1) may be based upon the written stipulation of the parties, subject to the approval of the court or the family court commissioner. Temporary orders made by the family court commissioner may be reviewed by the court as provided in s. 767.13 (6).

AB193, s. 6 Section 6. 767.25 (1j) of the statutes is renumbered 767.25 (1j) (a) and amended to read:

AB193,5,2 767.25 (1j) (a) Except as provided in sub. (1m), if the court denies periods of physical placement to one parent or if the court grants periods of physical placement to both parents but one parent has physical placement of the child for less than 15% of the time, the court shall determine child support payments by using the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9).

AB193, s. 7 Section 7. 767.25 (1j) (b) of the statutes is created to read:

AB193,5,7 767.25 (1j) (b) Except as provided in sub. (1m), if the court grants periods of physical placement to both parents and each parent has physical placement of the child for at least 15% of the time, the court shall determine child support payments in the following manner:

AB193,5,9 1. The gross child support obligation of each parent shall be calculated by using the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9).

AB193,5,12 2. Each parent's gross child support obligation calculated under subd. 1. shall be multiplied by that parent's percentage of time spent with the child or children, based on the periods of physical placement granted to the parent.

AB193,5,15 3. The net child support obligation of each parent shall be calculated by subtracting the product determined under subd. 2. for the parent from the gross child support obligation of that parent calculated under subd. 1.

AB193,5,18 4. The parent with the greater net child support obligation under subd. 3. shall pay as child support, to the parent with the smaller net child support obligation under subd. 3., the difference between those net child support obligations.

AB193, s. 8 Section 8. 767.25 (1m) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,5,25 767.25 (1m) (intro.) Upon request by a party, the court may modify the amount of child support payments determined under sub. (1j) if, after considering the following factors, the court finds by the greater weight of the credible evidence that use of the percentage standard the amount of child support determined by using the method of calculating child support under sub. (1j) is unfair to the child or to any of the parties:

AB193, s. 9 Section 9. 767.25 (1m) (ej) of the statutes is repealed.

AB193, s. 10 Section 10. 767.25 (1n) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,6,12 767.25 (1n) If the court finds under sub. (1m) that use of the percentage standard the amount of child support determined by using the method of calculating child support under sub. (1j) is unfair to the child or the requesting party, the court shall state in writing or on the record the amount of support that would be required by using the percentage standard method of calculating child support under sub. (1j), the amount by which the court's order deviates from that amount, its reasons for finding that use of the percentage standard the amount of child support determined by using the method of calculating child support under sub. (1j) is unfair to the child or the party, its reasons for the amount of the modification and the basis for the modification.

AB193, s. 11 Section 11. 767.32 (1) (b) 4. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,6,20 767.32 (1) (b) 4. A If the judgment or order was entered under s. 48.355 (2) (b) 4., 48.357 (5m) or 48.363 (2), a difference between the amount of child support ordered by the court to be paid by the payer and the amount that the payer would have been required to pay based on the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9) if the court did not use the percentage standard in determining the child support payments and did not provide the information required under s. 46.10 (14) (d), 767.25 (1n) or 767.51 (5d), whichever is appropriate.

AB193, s. 12 Section 12. 767.32 (1) (b) 5. of the statutes is created to read:

AB193,7,3 767.32 (1) (b) 5. If the judgment or order was entered under this chapter or s. 948.22 (7), a difference between the amount of child support ordered by the court to be paid by the payer and the amount that the payer would have been required to pay based on the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) if the court did not use that method in determining the child support payments and did not provide the information required under s. 767.25 (1n) or 767.51 (5d), whichever is appropriate.

AB193, s. 13 Section 13. 767.32 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,7,8 767.32 (2) Except as provided in sub. (2m) or (2r), if the court revises a judgment or order with respect to child support payments, it shall do so by using the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9) method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j).

AB193, s. 14 Section 14. 767.32 (2m) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,7,15 767.32 (2m) Upon request by a party, the court may modify the amount of revised child support payments determined under sub. (2) if, after considering the factors listed in s. 767.25 (1m) or 767.51 (5), as appropriate, the court finds, by the greater weight of the credible evidence, that the use of the percentage standard amount of revised child support determined by using the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) is unfair to the child or to any of the parties.

AB193, s. 15 Section 15. 767.45 (7) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,7,21 767.45 (7) The clerk of court shall provide without charge, to each person bringing an action under this section, except to the state under sub. (1) (g) or (6m), a document setting forth the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9) and the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) and listing the factors which that a court may consider under s. 767.51 (5).

AB193, s. 16 Section 16. 767.455 (6) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,8,2 767.455 (6) Document. The summons served on the respondent shall be accompanied by a document, provided without charge by the clerk of court, setting forth the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9) and the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) and listing the factors which that a court may consider under s. 767.51 (5).

AB193, s. 17 Section 17. 767.51 (4m) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,8,6 767.51 (4m) Except as provided in sub. (5), the court shall determine child support payments by using the percentage standard established by the department under s. 49.22 (9) method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j).

AB193, s. 18 Section 18. 767.51 (5) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,8,13 767.51 (5) (intro.) Upon request by a party, the court may modify the amount of child support payments determined under sub. (4m) if, after considering the following factors, the court finds by the greater weight of the credible evidence that use of the percentage standard the amount of child support determined by using the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) is unfair to the child or to the requesting party:

AB193, s. 19 Section 19. 767.51 (5d) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,8,24 767.51 (5d) If the court finds under sub. (5) that use of the percentage standard the amount of child support determined by using the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) is unfair to the child or the requesting party, the court shall state in writing or on the record the amount of support that would be required by using the percentage standard method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j), the amount by which the court's order deviates from that amount, its reasons for finding that use of the percentage standard the amount of child support determined by using the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) is unfair to the child or the party, its reasons for the amount of the modification and the basis for the modification.

AB193, s. 20 Section 20. 948.22 (7) (bm) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB193,9,8 948.22 (7) (bm) Upon request, the court may modify the amount of child or spousal support payments determined under par. (b) 2. if, after considering the factors listed in s. 767.25 (1m) or 767.51 (5), regardless of the fact that the action is not one for a determination of paternity or an action specified in s. 767.25 (1), the court finds, by the greater weight of the credible evidence, that the use of the percentage standard amount of child support determined by using the method of calculating child support under s. 767.25 (1j) is unfair to the child or to either of the child's parents.

AB193,9,9 (End)